![tilt shift focus on mac tilt shift focus on mac](https://www.bestshareware.net/download/img2/tilt-shift-focus-big.jpg)
If anybody claims that he/she can do the same with regular lens and some post processing while retaining the same quality, he/she either never really used this lens or doesn't really needed such lens and doesn't want to spare time to learn how to use it. However, when you do need features of this lens and take time to learn how to shoot with it - nothing comes close to quality you will receive. Btw - architectural and landscape photography, where this lens finds most applications will require a tripod and some patience (when composing) in most cases anyway.
![tilt shift focus on mac tilt shift focus on mac](https://dronedj.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Untitled-design-147.png)
It is also a demanding lens to use - you most probably will use a tripod (unless you have super steady hands, be patient, and take some time to. Then you may feel disappointed, but it will not be because the product is not good, it will be because you didn't bother to think whether you really need it when buying it. To be honest, if you do not have a need for it will quickly become your once-in-a-quite-long-long-while lens. I agree - it is not your everyday lens, not even your every week lens.
TILT SHIFT FOCUS ON MAC FULL
Is it worth twice as much as the first version? Absolutely! View full Review Use one for a day and you'll understand why. The image quality is phenomenal and the tilt-shift actions give the lens a versatility that, in many ways, cannot be mimicked with software. I was using a lens with some notable weaknesses in order to take advantage of the benefits that come with being able to tilt and shift. When I was shooting with the original TS-E 24, the Mk I, I realized that I was making a trade off. My point is that the TS-E 24 II is a very good tool for anyone to suggest it is "useless" is bringing their own knowledge and credibility into question. It comes down to choosing the right tool for the job. The t/s is heavier its manual-only focus system make it unsuitable for situations requiring fast focusing, and it lacks the image stabilization and/or wider apertures available in other lenses. So am I suggesting that a standard 24 has no advantages over its tilt-shift brethren? Not at all.
TILT SHIFT FOCUS ON MAC SOFTWARE
However, to suggest that a work around is to use a standard lens and correct the distortion with software completely ignores the fact that you lose even more resolution - significantly more - by "stretching the pixels" in software after capture. If you shoot at f/8, the loss is minimal even with an extreme shift, but it is there. How much depends on the quality of the particular lens (which, in the case of this lens is outstanding), how far you are shifted, and at what aperture you are shooting. When you shift a t/s lens, it is accurate to say that you lose resolution during the process. The same is true when a t/s lens is mounted on a monopod and shifted.
![tilt shift focus on mac tilt shift focus on mac](https://phototrend.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Focus2-Architecture-940x628.jpg)
You will achieve the same results (by which I mean blur from camera shake or slight focus inaccuracies from minor movements as you take the shot) as hand holding a standard lens at the same shutter speed and f/stop - minus the keystoning. When using SHIFT, the feature that allows you to maintain straight vertical lines with architecture and tall trees, you ABSOLUTELY CAN hand hold it. You can't mimic infinite focus unless you start out that way and if you're going to try to use focus-bracketed shots with PS to get close, you still need a tripod for your bracketed shots. It is laughable that the work around is to hand hold a standard lens and use software. It is true that you need a tripod when using TILT. Some suggest that you can't hand hold this lens so you might as well shoot with a standard lens and use software. It is worth noting that this infinite focus effect is NOT something you can easily achieve in software (although PS does have a function requiring multiple bracketed-focus images that attempts to do so). If you can achieve the same thing using tilt at f/8, you will end up with a significantly sharper image because of the diffraction that occurs at f/16 and beyond. What's more, if you are able to achieve seamless foreground-to-background focus w/o tilt, you're probably doing it at f/16-22. Wide angle lenses are often used close up, and the closer you are to your subject, the more you will need to employ tilt to bring the background into focus - even at narrow apertures with a wide angle lens. Some will argue that you don't benefit from this with a 24mm (wide angle) lens because of its inherently deep depth-of-field. lessly sharp image from close up to infinity using the tilt feature. My favorite feature of this lens is its ability to create a seam. My extensive experience with t/s lenses and my particular experience with this lens leaves me scratching my head at a few of the comments I've read about the use of tilt-shift lenses and this lens in particular. Canon engineers hit a home run with this lens. Awesome doesn't begin to describe the image quality you can get with it. I've used this lens, which replaced the marginal Mk I version I owned previously, for over a year.